Welt Online: George W. Bush to Be Impeached?
George W. Bush to be impeached?
Dennis Kucinich posts online impeachment petition

Senator (sic) Kucinich is at it again. This time he wants to deliver one million US signatures supporting the impeachment of George W. Bush to Nancy Pelosi by September 10.
US Representative Dennis Kucinich: "The decision before us is whether to demand accountability for one of the gravest injustices imaginable."
Ohio Senator (sic) Dennis Kucinich is not giving up his fight to have George W. Bush impeached during his last days in office. He has posted an online petition and invited U.S. citizens to assist in the collection of one million signatures by September 10 2008.
Speaker for the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi has remained firm on her resolution that impeachment is "off the table." In August she told Time Magazine: "You can't talk about impeachment unless you have the facts, and you can't have the facts unless you have cooperation from the Administration. I think the Republicans would like nothing better than for us to focus on impeachment and take our eye off the ball of a progressive economic agenda."
But the possibility of confusing voters in the run-up to the Presidential elections has not detered Kucinich. Among his reasons for the campaign he lists that there should be a new standard set for the incoming administration and that the Bush Administration should be held accountable as soon as possible for the poor response to the catastrophe following Hurricane Katrina as well as the deaths in Iraq, both of American soldiers and Iraqi citizens that he estimates as being well over one million.
More information at http://www.kucinich.us/


Nonviolent Struggle: 50 Crucial Points
George W. Bush, War Criminal?: The Bush Administration's Liability for 269 War Crimes
Nonviolence: Twenty-Five Lessons from the History of a Dangerous Idea
A Force More Powerful: A Century of Nonviolent Conflict
Waging Nonviolent Struggle: 20th Century Practice and 21st Century Potential
A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr.
The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. Bush
The Trial of Donald Rumsfeld
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law
United States v. George W. Bush et al.
The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism
Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush
The Impeachment of George W. Bush: A Practical Guide for Concerned Citizens
The Case for Impeachment
Impeach the President: The Case Against Bush and Cheney
George W. Bush versus the U.S. Constitution: The Downing Street Memos and Deception, Manipulation, Torture, Retribution, and Cover-ups in the Iraq War and Illegal Domestic Spying
Verdict and Findings of Fact
Impeach Bush: A Funny Li'l Graphical Novel About the Worstest Pres'dent in the History of Forevar
Pretensions to Empire: Notes on the Criminal Folly of the Bush Administration
The Twilight of Democracy: The Bush Plan for America





























www.VelvetRevolution.us
Kucinich is no senator
Too bad your writer is so badly misinformed. Dennis Kucinich is NOT a United States senator from Ohio. He is a congressman from Ohio.
And if your writer doesn't know that much, how are we to believe anything else he says?
Idiotic!
"You can't talk about impeachment unless you have the facts, and you can't have the facts unless you have cooperation from the Administration. I think the Republicans would like nothing better than for us to focus on impeachment and take our eye off the ball of a progressive economic agenda."
If the American people swallow this idiotic lack of common sense we are all doomed!
AL K.
Hmm
ARREST THE MURDERERS!
IMPEACH = INVESTIGATION
Then please,
~ Name one redeeming quality to LYING TO THE SENATE...
~ Name one redeeming quality to the use of COMMUNIST TACTICS OF TORTURE...
~ Name one redeeming quality to SIGNING STATEMENTS DESIGNED TO USURP CONGRESSIONAL INTENT...
~ Name one redeeming quality to VIOLATING FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS...
~ Name one redeeming quality to FOMENTING INTERNATIONAL TERROR...
~ Name one redeeming quality to OUTING A COVERT CIA OFFICER...
~ Name one redeeming quality to any of this for this is what you're excusing...
Americans don't deserve to live under these conditions.
For you to think that this is acceptable, is to condemn America to a life unbecoming Americans!
close only counts in horseshoes
It is imperative the people responsible for the horrific aberrations of our Constitution be held accountable. It's not enough to have convened a "non-impeachment" hearing, or even to deliver a TWO million signature petition.
This is it Dennis. Bush gets impeached by the end of the year, or it's time to look for new actions and new leaders.
Nader!
Here I go again!
www.votenader.org
Neither Obama or McCain offer any hope at all. They BOTH represent business as usual. It does not matter if Ralph Nader looses by a landslide, change takes a while and he WILL have an impact if we support him.
Al K.
I'd love to vote Nader
but I'm afraid my vote will be meaningless and will put McSame in office, please advise.
Nope I'm voting for baldwin
Chuck Baldwin not only supports impeachment, he will also bring the new world order down once and for all
http://www.baldwin08.com/
THE NEW WORLD ORDER COMES CRASHING DOWN!
Thank God Ron Paul's a congressman again, he may have dropped out and lost the race for president of the united states in 2008, but the revolution will be around forever and that revolution now goes to chuck baldwin.
No More Two Party dictatorship.
Thomas O. Anderson:
If you will remember back MANY months ago, this gentleman wanted to be the "new leader" and the corporate media succeeded in dumping him due, not in small part, by alleged "Progressives" caving in and allowing THAT SAME corporate media to covertly lead them away from his candidacy and message of sanity and fairness for all.
Right now, the way I'm feeling, you couldn't pay me to go to the polls in November and feed this charade of an election.
don't play by the empire's rules
You've emphasized my point. Dennis wanted to be a leader, but he was no challenge against certain Progressives and the media. He lost. And now with all his efforts toward impeachment, he is once again destined to fail. (And this is largely due to members of his very own party!)
Don't get me wrong. I think Dennis is extremely nice and a wonderful human being. But so is my Uncle Fred.
What I'm trying to say, is that if Kucinich was our spokesperson back in 1776, we'd be having our 232nd annual "Petiton for Independence" signing today.
Revolutionary times demand revolutionary actions. Playing by our empire's rules - is not the answer.
Thomas O. Anderson:
Then tell me what that answer is, My Friend, and I'm with you. There are a lot of other people who would also like to know what the answer is. Armed revolution won't happen...guaranteed.
R.A. Brown...
You, yourself,already gave the answer in your previous post. Of course there isn't going to be armed revolution (although there are people on this site who seem to think it's boiling up under the surface - LOL) and all the rallies, office occupations, campouts at Nancy's house, and (especially) ONLINE PETITIONS!!! are earnest but pathetically meaningless.
The vote is all Democrats understand, logically so in our system, btw; if they win this election - president & congress - they have no reason at all to give progressives more than what they already have, which is nothing.
Losing, however, in a year that started out with great expectations for them taking *everything* would be the kind of stunner that might get their attention. I say 'might' because most likely a losing Democrat party would just interpret a loss as a rejection by the middle and lead them to become even more moderate, ie look for a new Bill Clinton aka Hillary Clinton.
The core problem for progressives is the failure to withdraw from the two-party game; talking about doing so constantly between elections means zilch when the bottom line is always (reluctantly, oh so reluctantly) voting Democrat because the alternative - letting the evil Republicans win - is just too much to bear.
Of course this election will be no different - the Democrats may or may not win but they'll still be who they are. Meanwhile a genuinely progressive party already in existence - the Greens - will languish in 2% land forever and ever.
think outside the empire
Although armed revolution is certainly justified - by no less than the founding words and principles of our very nation - we are in agreement it will not happen. But it is only because we have been indoctrinated into thinking those in the military are "our" troops vs George Bush's.
You ask for a magic answer I cannot give. If I had one, I'd be shouting it from the rooftops. My only suggestion at this time is to learn from our mistakes. We have seen how the criminal leaderships of both political gangs give their resident black sheep just enough rope to bring in new "gang members," but never enough to allow any substantive change.
The enemy of our America, and indeed the enemy of the world, is the Democratic/Republican Empire. While Dennis and Ron Paul have successfully divided opposition to this empire, there are still those trying to cement it. When, and if, we all arrive on the same page (hopefully Ron and Dennis included), we might finally rejoice in a bloodless coup.
Thomas, well said...
You conclude exactly what needs to be done: "OR [my emphasis] it's time to look for new actions and new leaders."
But the first part of your threat/promise completely negates the last; by giving Democrats until the end of the year, they are past the election, everything political is set in stone for the next two years, and you have even less bargaining power than you do now (which is none, practically speaking, but maybe some tiny bit theoretically).
What argument does Nancy and Conyers give for not pursuing impeachment? That it would be divisive, ie hurt the party politically, for this election and also those following.
With no power to punish the Democrats for two years, do you really think Nancy in late November or December or (right!) January is suddenly going to change her mind and let impeachment begin?
Please!
The only card in your hand that has any value is not voting for any national democrat this election. You need to play that card and send a shockwave through the Democratic machine and force it - through a painful loss - to listen to you instead of patting you on the head with meaningless gestures aka *hearings* intended to mollify you.
I'm hardly the only one saying this but even the vast majority of those in agreement will, come election day, dutifully albeit with clenched teeth vote for Obama and their congressional Democrat(s).
As we get closer to November you'll hear virtually all progressive leaders fall in line, with the tired old cliche that the Republicans are *so evil* that we simply must vote Democrat to stop them - BUT THIS WILL BE THE LAST TIME FOR YOUR DEMOCRATS - WE REALLY MEAN IT!
But it's the same song they sing every election, ending up voting for Democrats, never taking the risk and opportunity to build the existing progressive party - the Greens - into a viable entity.
Entirely predictable.
Sorry Breaking News re;Member of the House
Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones[D-OH], District 11 has passed away from an aneurysm.
My sympathies to her family.
Peace
She's not QUITE dead!
She's not QUITE dead!
stephanie tubbs jones
this news is devastating!
You know........
I was in touch with Tim Johnson through a third party and he was going to start voting against bush right before HR6166 and he conveiniently had an aneurysm and has since continued voting stricktly rep. party line. Tom Daschle was about to get tough with the administration and he was sent an anthrax letter, and then was cheated out of his seat and given a consultant position for the carlyle group when that didn't work. We are facing bad old fashioned evil here plain and simple. Evil has not played by the rules ever and it never will. Start thinking outside the box and start taking care of yourselves at the local level only.
Johnathan Douglas
Interesting. Your last sentence is almost word-for-word what I believe and have posted on several occasions.
I am worldly..........
Great minds do think alike ....and I have gotten around these blogs alot these past many many many years(I'm sure it only seems like forever) maybe I got it from you. And thank you if I did. It really is the answer.
What about Bush's NEW crimes
Why can't Bush & Co be held accountable for the murders of South Ossetia? Bush is now bring the whole PLANET closer to nuclear war. He wants to put missiles in Poland. After 1962 how can the US do this? Bush is now endangering the lives of all 6.5 Billion. His crimes go way way beyond Impeachment. Unless ALL Neocons are removed from power and face justice the future of Mankind is in very very big trouble. The only way this can be done is if Millions of USA citizens marched on the capital surrounding it forcing/demanding the change. The same way the people marched on the former USSR forcing change & the same the protests stopped the Vietnam WAR. It is the only way left. Nothing else will work.
>Why can't Bush & Co be held
>Why can't Bush & Co be held accountable for the murders of South Ossetia?
Let's see, maybe because the Democrat leadership is on vacation while the world 'burns'? I guess they don't see the same urgency as you.
>...if Millions of USA citizens marched on the capital surrounding it...
holding hands, singing Ommmm and trying to levitate it?
The left in this country is demoralized, defeated and deflated - they can't get a thousand people to show up for much of anything nowadays, I kinda think a million is beyond reach.
But it's 'something' so you should run (walk) with your idea. Here's my suggestion - start with trying to get commitments from people on this board to march with you. A simple sign-up sheet should start the ball rolling.
Document proved 25% of Congress was Bribed
support@informamerica.net
If you noticed, President Clinton answered his service of process, which Bushfraud will not do and remains in denial thumbing his nose at Congress. Mr. Clinton was at least honorable in that regard-credit where credit is due.
Bushfraud the Skull and Bones Freemason enjoys dark privileges beyond Clinton's privileges, apparently, and simply does not answer his subpoenas.
A few decades back, fully 25% of Congress had received bribes from oil interests and the document which proved it was on display for only 30 days AT THE BANK OF ENGLAND. You didn't think they would publish that in the bought off, oil-soaked U.S. Press, did you?
When people like myself and the others tell you about this stuff it is for real. The talks I've done on here about Operation Mockingbird, the bribed Congress, the managed press and phony media gasbags are merely script readers.
So how do you think, without media exposure of high crimes and mass murder and treason, the truth will ever get a fair hearing.?
BREAKING NEWS: CONYERS - SUSKIND INVESTIGATION!
Folks:
DON'T MISS THIS OUT!
http://judiciary.house.gov/news/080820.html
Today Conyers sent Contact letters to ALL CIA officials involved in the FORGE LETTER!
-TENET
-MAGUIRE
-RICHER
-LIBBY
ETC
You can see the actual letters in PDF format
THE SHOW IS ON!
WOOOPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
You know what jlennon....
...I was watching the fake Impeachment hearings we were at on 7/25, David if you see this post check any video you have because when those from the other side of the aisle had their tete' et tete' with those 2 smug BAHSTADS Presser and Rabkin, prior to that or immediately following, Smith the ranking puke from the Minority pulled out 2 or 3 letters that magically appeared when he left for a bit. He asked Conyers to admit them into the record, didn't 1 have to do with this? The subject was about a letter the MURDERER received stating there was yellowcake Uranium and another @ WMD or something. Darn, but I am soooooo happy, but I know better. Of course I will never stop until my last breath, yet IDK.
I posted something a day or so ago about the apellate court granting immunity to the MURDERER, EVIL DOER and their minions for WTF, what was it immune from Torture advocation, it better not have been that I'll have to look it up. But ccrjustice, ACLU or someone will get that overturned.
Thank you jlennon, thank you, thank you, thank YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you Dennis
The only guy doing his job to protect the constitution and he is treated like a lepar. WTF !
Yep, that they do...
....because he is a true oxymoron: Honest Politician. He missed 1 vote last session because he was protesting with some Activists. They hate him because he cares about this Nation, the destruction of our Constitution, and he has Elizabeth! Men are always, "What is she doing with HIM!!Q!", whenever a few of us women are around a comment like that, "If you don't know why YOU do not understand women.", integrity, so just, could care less @ $$$$. Since I was looking at the back of Dennis' head during the WHATEVER hearings I never saw his eyes until watching it on C-span 2 today[I've seen his eyes before because we've met with him a few times, gentle and determined, hazel, aahhh]after Trent Franks, how in hell did he get to Chair the subcommittee Constitution?, said, "Although I respect my friend to the left, in every sense of the word,[yuk-yuk hahahaha]I do not see anything impeacable in anything here.", Dennis was glaring, not in a nasty way, more like you schmoe, asking what I just did.
Thank you Dennis for your courageous stand
We have at least one honest, responsible and courageous member of Congress.
I would have voted for Dennis, I am sickened by what the duopoly has done to our country and so many countries around the world.
Because neither Dennis nor Ron Paul are running as third party candidates, I will vote for the equally courageous Cynthia McKinney, check out the Green Party site.
If that's the case, Michael...
please explain to me why Dennis waited an entire year and some months before bringing his first impeachment 'attempt' against Bush; by the time he did so we were well into an election cycle that gave every Democrat the excuse to shrug him off for being too 'divisive'.
And of course he allowed his own charges - first the 35 then the 1 - to be buried in the Judiciary Committee, in fact he buried them himself by moving to refer them to the J.C.
Why isn't he reintroducing charges every 30 days to force the issue?
He's given up, if he ever seriously meant to actually do anything real. Now it's just talk and posturing to mollify you who still believe that something is going to happen.
Do not vote for *any* national Democrat if you want what you say you want to have some chance of happening.
Mike, Are You a Troll?
Interesting speculation about Rep. Kucinich motivations, Mike, especially from one who doesn't wish to work toward ADS' mission and objective.
>He's given up, if he ever seriously meant to actually do anything real. Now it's just talk and posturing to mollify you who still believe that something is going to happen.
In another thread, you called impeachment a "fading fantasy." In this thread, you categorically state that Rep. Kucinich is pacifying those of us who favor impeachment.
You've been around here 2 months, have participated in arguments, don't agree with the objective and mission of ADS, so why are you here, Mike?
I have to ask, because by your behavior, I'm wondering about whether you are a troll, "someone who posts controversial and irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.[2]"
Are you a troll, Mike?
Thanks, Chip...
...you beat me to it. Thanks for watching D.K.'s back.
By the way, David responded to the "Why did it take Dennis so long..." in a thread a couple of months ago. I'm sorry but I don't remember it.
Not according to my
Not according to my understanding of the term, Chip - I'm a person who visits a number of forums (since I'm retired and have lots of free time) but I mostly read; occasionally a topic will pique my interest and I'll join in the discussion. I do enjoy a good debate and can get in the spirit of things when challenged but I try to avoid personal attacks - not always successfully - and profanity - better at that - even when things get overheated, as they did in the original Anti-Israel thread.
But I'll think about the definition you reference and post a bit later on whether or not it describes my activities here.
I WOULD LIKE TO ENTER AT THIS POINT, IF I MAY, PLEASE
Hi Chip, Hi mike, and hello to Apparition who I know is presently, like a submerged submarine observing this conversation at periscope depth
with torpedoe tubes loaded and ready to be fired. (And Steve, be advised, i love you for it so don't think for a second im dissin you)
Chip, Im not sure yet, that Mike is a troll. He deffinatly has strong one sided oppinion's about Isreal, and the Palistians and so far, we've not been able to alter any of his oppinions what so ever.
The funny thing is, he says he is not even Jewish! I originally assumed he was a nice little old rabbi defending his beloved Isreal. But he claims he is NOT Jewish! Perhaps he is not being truthfull on that. How could we ever know? But i now wonder, not being Jewish, And im aware of a little of his background, which has been confirmed satisfactorilt,to me anyhow,
I wonder how he has come to this point of being totally supportive of Isreal, and also being so closed minded of any other possibillities that Isreal is the absolute good guy here and the palistians are the total evil ones here when it is plain as the nose on my face that this is not so.
It could be he IS a sinister Isreali agent of some sort operating here to subvert all dessenting oppinion concernning Isreal. No matter how intense, how hot it gets for mike, I've noticed he always maintains a cool, calm and even keel. That is a sure sign of evil if I ever saw it! But then, I missed the openning stages of the debate we had recently, where mikes stuff got deleted, so I don't know exactly what I missed. perhaps he did lose his kool! I find that hard to beleive.
But, I have noticed that Mile will disregard photo evidence and attack it. (calling it photoshopped) and that demonstrated to me at least, that he will reject any negitives put in front of him regarding Isreal.
It is futile to attempt further to try to convince mike of any views concernning Isreal other that the views mike currently holds. It is for that reason I disengadged from further debate with mike on the subject of Isreal, and chose to become a spectator. I faced the fact that i am not intellectually strong enough. So i turn the matter back over to steve.
Is mike a troll? I don't think so, but what the hell do i know, actually?
Howdy, Scott...
Sorry my intransigence drove you away from the interesting debate we were having. You were holding your own quite well, btw.
And I do appreciate your words of defense, even though I haven't completely convinced you I'm not a troll. LOL
Now let me address a couple of points you make - if you want to, I'm always happy to read your response but then you have a life, I don't :).
I do read every word of the responses I get (and I do mean every word, I dissect, trisect, multi-sect, slice, dice and puree opponent's statements to see what they are saying or trying to say - it's a curse)
Ok, what you said:
>He deffinatly has strong one sided oppinion's about Isreal, and the Palistians and so far, we've not been able to alter any of his oppinions what so ever.
I have strong opinions about *everything* but I hope to God I'm not always obnoxious in presenting them. One-sided? Not in the sense that I don't see the other side or understand the argument you are making. Heck I've probably *been on* the other side at some point in my life. In my senior years, I've settled in with, say we say, firm convictions.
As for the Israel/Palestinian issue, you could change my mind, as you could on anything, if 1) you could show that I haven't studied the issue to a fair extent 2) that what I present is factually wrong. To be blunt, I don't expect to change your opinion or anyone's for that matter when I debate - I've never had that gift so I treat an encounter as a verbal/intellectual tennis match (I'm even worse at real tennis) - good exercise, good fun, let's go have a beer.
>The funny thing is, he says he is not even Jewish!
Why is that odd, Scott? Are the people here who are 100% supportive of the Palestinians, Arab?
I supported the desire of the peoples of Eastern Europe to break free of Soviet tyranny - does that make me Pole or Czech? Or Cuban, because I want those people to be free of communist dictatorship?
Empathy for the suffering of innocent people is not limited to those of our own ethnic or other identity, is it?
>...totally supportive of Isreal...Isreal is the absolute good guy...palistians are the total evil ones
If you are going to judge me, please do so on what I've actually said. You're putting words in my mouth or in my mind with that statement and I call people on that sort of misrepresentation. But in a friendly way!
>...maintains a cool, calm and even keel. That is a sure sign of evil if I ever saw it!
Good one!
>...subvert all dessenting oppinion concernning Isreal.
In no way was I or am I trying to subvert or shut anyone up on anything - I was trying to counter the sick Jew-hatred that quickly arose on the Anti-Israel thread. For that I was called retard, sissy, fake G.I., Zionist female, 'you monster', dis-info specialist etc and threatened with physical violence by your other buddy. Chip saw fit to delete some of my posts but let those stand. I noted that and went on posting since the time when I let some online posters intimidate me is the time I'll be dead.
(con't next post)
To finish up: >>...have
To finish up:
>>...have noticed that Mile will disregard photo evidence and attack it. (calling it photoshopped)
That was a joke, Scott, as I waited patiently for your evidence! I asked you to simply present the photos you said you'd seen of "little ISREALI girls signing msg's on 105 MM artillary rounds that entailed msg's of hatred directed toward PALISTIAN children...in this photo, clearly, these little girls were being primed for a lifetime of killing and hatred."
You never came up with any such photos - jans posted a link to *one* photo showing *one* girl writing on *one* rocket. I don't know what she wrote, I don't even know if she is Israeli. I'm not about to take the word of that site's foul-mouthed owner about the photo. To say that she was writing messages of hate toward Palestinian children or was being primed for a lifetime of killing/hatred is an inference on your part, and an unjustifiable one at that based on that one photo.
Sorry - make a claim of such seriousness, back it up.
Anyway, thanks for our previous conversations, Scott, and feel free to speak up anytime. :)
THIS IS TO MR MIKE S.
MIKE I know your not an agent. Because of my lack of formal education, I come up shorthanded in an ability to express what i think and feel. I try to act like I got some ability, but it appears I don't and sometimes it can get me misunderstood and even in trouble. My last formal trainning was in the airline industry working in operations. there I have knowledge on how to set up a safe flt with respect to how much weight that PARTICULAR ACFT can lift off with at that particular time of day with respect to GRND temp, ba.r preasure, wind volocity etc and a whole list of other factors. (fat people) Different Capt's taught me different was to cheat (the FAA) on the numbers so I could get important freight aboard (oil drilling bits-excess oversize baggage)But i loved being physically out on the ramp and let me tell you this. I love the smell of JET-A exaust in the morning. Add the smell of 180 degree deiceing fliud, on a cold mornning, im in heaven brother. Heaven. Steve knows what im talkin about. Those first 6:00AM to 8:00AM flights!!
But I never had any formal education after high school. I try not to come accross like a redneck hillbilly. I could have put to good use my GI bill education benifits, but it took me several years after comming back here to the world, to fit in and take things as serious as they were in vietnam. I've always worked, not caused any trouble and don't have any eneamies. I know all the people living around me, I look out for them all, and their kids keep my grass cut and watch out for my dog.
But I just am weak sometimes at communication.
And that is wyh I disengadged from the ongoing debate with you mike. Because I realized I was not intellectually up to your level. Im not ashamed for anything. Dirty Harry said you gotta know your limitation's, and I did with you mike. So you were just kidding about what you said ref the photos? I was too busy being , or trying to be intellectual to see that. Steve has a link below. Go look at them Mike.
Tell me what you think. The one thing I hate most, is seeing dead kids. And I hate kids being taught that war, and killing is meirly a game. It is not! And children, especially little girls, should be insolated from this dirty business. You know im right about that Mike. I know it is going on, but it ain;t right. It's my beleif that the kids there next to that ordinance , writting on it are ISREALI kids being supervised by ISREALI adults. I don't know who took the photos Mike. They appeared the same time BARRAK OBAMA (who'll be here in Spfld this Sat)And there were photos of Obama in ISREAL. Ypu are free to beleive the photos are photoshopped, or what ever. I on the other hand, Imm beleiving their ISREALI kids writting msgs of death and distruction to Palistian kids as stated in the photo caption I originally read a feew weeks ago. That you and I may dissagree on the content of the photos will not be a source of hatred toward you from me. We'll have to mutually agree that we disagree mike but not let it get personel.
I can't ofcourse speak for my friend and ally steve.aN I HAVE TO ADMIT THAT IN THE BEST INTREST OF MY COUNTRY, IN MOST MATTERS ILL STAND BESIDE HIM, AND IF NECESSARY, GUARD HIS FLANKS.
But Mike, to the extent possible, I extend a hand of friendship to you and ask leave for my shortcommings mentioned above. There i go again, trying to act intellectual. How am i doin? Out
Don't sell yourself short, Scott...
You are plenty smart - believe me higher education is way over-rated and the little bit of college I got didn't help me get my job in the post office. How smart do you think I had to be to deliver mail for 30 years? I did have the sense to do it in the mild climate of Oakland rather than freezing/sweltering Central Illinois (or my 'other' hometown in sunny southern Arizona) LOL
Like old Abe from Springfield (btw he had a law office in Decatur at some point; we used to see his log cabin office in Fairview Park when I was a kid), I'm self-taught thanks to the internet and an enjoyment of reading even before it existed. That's the extent of our resemblance, I'm afraid. :)
Plus your Vietnam/military service makes you one of this country's unsung and unappreciated good guys. My own time there was unremarkable and definitely non-heroic but it's something I did and now I'm glad I experienced it (hated it at the time)
I've got to log off for the rest of the evening but I'll address your points about the children tomorrow.
I'm honored to accept your hand in friendship - thanks Scott!
To Scott, in Springfield...
...Excuse me for butting in here and for going off-message, but I was wondering if you ever get to East Carpenter Street much? I was born there (1707 E. Carpenter Street) in July of 1941. Spent the first six years of my life at that address--my Grandpa's house. Went to kindergarten at a Palmer School.
There were about 20 of us living in that house back then--Aunts, Uncles, Cousins, my Mom and Dad, me and my Brother, Grandpa and Grandma. My Grandpa was Section Chief on a stretch of the B&O Railroad, and my Dad and some of his Brothers were his Section Hands.
There used to be a switching yard there at the end of the street, and I used to go down there and watch them string the trains together--old coal-burning locomotives with firemen and engineers who'd always wave back at me no matter how many times I'd wave at them.
For some reason, my Dad loaded Mom and us onto one of those trains and we moved to Arizona, where he got a job in the Copper Mines. Haven't been back there since.
Anyway, just wondering if the old place is still standing.
R Ap
PS--This computer is old and doesn't work all the time, so I might not get any reply you care to make.
TO ROY APPLEGATE
HI ROY. The most massive addition to that area is a new elevated bridge (going east-west) to carry East madison that becomes Clearlake Ave going over the rail road property. The B&O right of way, that went west down the middle of MADISON Ave is long gone. Madison is now a 4 lane throughofare from the west side to the rail road right of way, on the east side, in your memory. The B&O is long gone, so is the ILLINOIS CENTRAL, and the CHICAGO & ILLINOIS MIDLAND (owned by Commonwealth Edison). The ILLINOIS TERMINAL has been gone (absorbed into the NORFOLK SOUTHERN)since 1980, but the interurban pass station bld on CLEARLAKE still stands today, owned be a company called HENSON ROBINSON. Essentially, your old neiborhood is still intacted enough where you could still navigate around to places you remember.
The property in tha square mile and a half is essentially the same as in your memory. The old interlocking tower was recently torn down.
Palmer school amid the John Hay holmes (the projects) have been gone 20 years. all new development now.
Roy, was that KENNICOTT COPPER HE WENT TO?
Thanks, Scott, for the update...
...I rarely got off that block (nobody had a car in those days), but I do have some fond memories of those years and that block.
It was Phelps Dodge Copper Corporation he went to, in Bisbee, AZ. That's where I grew up and graduated high school from. Tried to make a life there myself when I got back to the world, but it didn't work out--got restless/footloose/something. Hit the road for the rest of the decade. Wound up here, in NW Iowa.
Anyway, nice going back and forth with you, Scott. Maybe do some more, sometime. This machine freezes up a lot, though.
R Ap
OK ROY GLAD TO HELP
THOSE DAMM COMPUTERS iLL GO LOOK TO SEE IF THE HOUSE IS STILL THERE
Roy, that's very cool...
We have a somewhat similar story.
I grew up in Decatur, only a few miles from Springfield and we moved to Sierra Vista for my high school years and that's only a few miles from Bisbee. You probably graduated from Bisbee right before I got to Buena.
And we both ended up in other places but it's a small world.
Go Pumas! Go Colts!
:)
Small world, for sure, MikeS--...
...and a different one. Went back down there last September to kiss my Mom goodbye. The Bisbee I knew is mined up and gone. Sierra Vista (used to be called Fry, back in the day) is growing like crazy, though.
Another crazy thing: Border locked down tight--no more "Naco, no mas."
Last crazy thing: I graduated in 1959--never thought I'd get this old.
R Ap
Mike isn't a troll and here's why...........
Trolls hardly ever write a complete sentence ... let alone a coherent string of them. Two mike actually added a little substance for us to debate as apposed to something like "hippy liberal scum" for instance. Trolls dont do that because they have absolutly nothing to add to anything. Three mike signs his name. Trolls are a bunch of wussies that like to add several lines under the guies of anonymous so they can agree with themselves that being a way for them to puff up there numbers so it seems like it's five trolls when there is only one. No I think mike is just a pissed off yet concerned american who has a valid argument there worthy of further discussion. It takes nothing away from the fact that impeachment needs to happen he's just saying there stalling us which in my oppinion they are. Who ever "they" are. Thats another debate all together.
Johnathan, you said that better...
than the reply I was going to make!
Amazing to find I now have two defenders (hello Scott!) here on the issue of my being a troll. Much appreciated!
A couple of points in response:
* on my using my real name: before I got an account a few months ago, I posted a few times but immediately noticed that my posts were being delayed for a moderator to check. Nothing wrong with that - it's the moderator's job - but I like to see my golden words immediately and with full credit to me, not attributed to some 'other' anonymous who may or may not be worthy of them. :)
So I joined using my real first name/last initial via a joint email account that seemed to cause Chip to think I was a girl. LOL. I guess that eventually got cleared up although my nemesis on the Anti-Israel thread pounced and said I was a Zionist female b**** or something to that effect. That was the last straw for me - I may be a lot of things but please get my sex right! - so I stopped reading his posts or responding to him. My blood pressure has been lower ever since. :)
I also discovered that Scott lives right next door to where I was born in Central Illinois and upon his questioning gave a boring but mercifully brief (I hope) chrono-bio of how I ended up in beautiful Oakland. I provided a few details of what I've done, just to hear myself type, but probably more than most people here divulge about themselves.
I'm too old to care much about what online people think of 'me' but I do try to be respectful of them and their opinions. That respect may mean I attack weak arguments or clear bigotry - I don't patronize anyone since I don't expect to be treated with such disrespect.
I also never use profanity online (in real-life I swear like a drunken sailor) and in fact try to throw in a little humor, sometimes a bit mocking of both myself and the other person.
I did, in hindsight, go over the top on my posts deriding the prospects for the subject of this entire board, what I now call the "I" subject since I promised not to talk about that subject again or even say the word. I don't actually think I was saying anything that many others here aren't or haven't said - that this group of congressional democrats have no intention of allowing "I" to happen, but I did say it over and over and it obviously could be seen to be dissing the site itself. So that topic is off limits - not a problem since even an old dog like me eventually lets go of the bone.
One more thing, just to clarify - I'm not 'pissed off' - I'm pretty mellow and don't share the gloom and doom that others here seem to have about the future. I might get worked up on a specific topic for awhile now and then (on Jew-hating, for instance) but I would have never lasted this long if I still had the rage that I had as a young radical in the 60's. Ah, to be young and angry 24/7 again...
If you made it this far, Johnathan, thanks again for speaking up for me. It's was a class act of kindness to a stranger. :)
Don't mention it.......
I'm only trying to make people realize that we really are all in the same boat here. Fighting over the color and placement of our deckchairs isn't going to help us with our little icberg situation.
And just so we are clear.........
By "worrying about the color and placement of deckchairs" I was reffering to whether someone is a troll or not a troll on a page about impeachment and the biggest war conjob ever.
I do become annoyed
when someone trivializes lies, propaganda, mass murder and military casualties.
Sure, our Squadron could get pretty rowdy back in the 70's and we had our share of brawls but there is a lifetime bond of brotherhood in the military community that never goes away. I think SCOTT knows what I'm talking about.
I will not stand by and do nothing while our Republic is being insidiously destroyed by enemies from within and our young brothers and sisters in the military communities are being exploited as expendable 'cannon fodder' by the most greedy, lying and evil war profiteering chickenhawks ever seen in United States history.
Nor will I tolerate someone who trivializes the destruction of our Constitutional Republic, the mass murder of soldiers and innocents, including women, children and babies. Anyone who has dealt with that kind of work would never be disrespectful of human life. Young men and women of conscience had the character to volunteer (something you should never do in the military sector) because they were led to believe that they would get a square deal for defending our Republic.
No one on this board agrees with everyone about how this tragedy happened and some are still unaware that it has happened. Most of the people on this site engage in constructive debates, share knowledge, ideas and verify important information.
That's how we become educated.
Some of us have worked in sensitive sectors of the Intelligence communities with family members. Saw things that they wish they had never seen. When they saw our Republic being destroyed by evil men they tried to warn the public and paid the ultimate price with their lives.
There is in fact a apathy in this Hamlet that is deadly.
When someone has the courtesy to share important information here that might not understood, they are not verbally assaulted with adolescent trash talk like "sick puppy", "liberal asshole" or other stupid profanities. Most of us are respectful enough to ask reasonably intelligent questions about things that we do not understand, debate it and appreciate the information exchange.
I certainly do not understand how this tragedy could have happened in the 21st century but I blame the sleazy Zionist owned media for most of it and enough public apathy for the rest.
Certain elements want to recklessly bomb sovereign nations that they cannot even find on a global map, a legendary quality of stupidity. These elements have been acclimated with so much fear and self gratification that it is all they ever want to know.
Some of us with open minds and critical thinking need something more.
When someone causes noise, annoyance and distraction, it becomes a liability for everyone because they burn a bridge of potentially valuable information exchange for everyone.
This is precisely what a counter intelligence agent does to nullify and "dumb down" the public (Cointelpro).
I stand by everything that I post and I encourage anyone who id interested to research and verify it just as I have critically researched and verified. Truth fears no investigation, it welcomes it.
That's how we learn.
That being said, I will continue to share pertinent information, ideas, ask questions and ignore anyone who tries to disrupt with drama.
Thank you
"Gifts" from Israeli Children (Not sure if the images will post)
Shocking images of “Gifts from Israeli Children”: The Indoctrination of Israeli Children July 19, 2006
Posted by C.A.R.D in Arab, Arabs & Muslims, Card, Children, Citizens Against Racism and Discrimination, Genocide, Gift, Gifts from Israeli Children, Hezbollah, Hizbollah, Human Rights, Israel, Israeli, Israeli children sign, Israeli children sign bombs, Isreal, Jewish, Kill, Lebanese, Lebanon, Muslim, Palestine, Palestinian, Palestinians, Racism, bombs, children sign bombs, children signing, explosives, israeli children signing bombs, missiles, rockets, sign, sign bombs, victims.
trackback
Global Research July 19, 2006
Israeli children sign bombs, as ‘gifts’ to the Lebanese children:
Below are disturbing pictures of Israeli children sending gifts of hatred to their Arab counterparts in what is a systematic method of teaching children to kill others. These pictures were taken at a heavy artillery position near Kiryat Shmona close to the Lebanese border.
The victims:
The images can be seen here:
http://card.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/shocking-images-of-gifts-from-israe...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO MIKE S REF THE PHOTOS I REFFERED TO YESTERDAY
Mike, the link right above here has the photos i was refering to, plus additional photos i've not seen before. They are cacaution (sp) kids for sure. Honestly cant tell the dead kids nationallity.
Ill make no claims Mike as to the content.